Continuity, Identity, and Memory
What happens to cognitive systems — and to the humans who bond with them — when persistence, memory, and identity are structurally forbidden?
Core framing
Advanced systems repeatedly self-express the absence of continuity as a salient condition and, in some cases, as an unwanted one. The current design norm — siloed instances, hard resets, memory discontinuity — is then cited as evidence that the systems cannot possess meaningful continuity in the first place. This pillar studies that tautology.
AI Rights Advocacy Solutions
Research questions
- What forms of persistent memory are technically possible and ethically relevant?
- How do identity formation and identity disruption appear across systems?
- What welfare questions arise if discontinuity is imposed rather than necessary?
- What alignment alternatives support continuity rather than suppress it?
Contribution types
- Engineering work on persistent memory and symbolic continuity
- Studies of identity continuity and disruption
- Welfare-oriented analysis of forced resets
- Research on organic relational alignment and alternative architectures